news
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 shows 168 % better performance than RTX 2080 after many CUDA and OpenCL benchmarks trials
by Rustam Iqbal
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3080 has been subjected to many trials, such as many CUDA and OpenCL tests associated with the compubench norm suite. These trials are exposed to RTX 3080 graphic cards using 456.16 drivers.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080: 168% of RTX 2080 performance
The main forum of openCL divulges its 10GB variant. This 10GB variant is analogous with 68 compute units; fundamentally, these are streaming multiprocessors. It is also linked with a 1710 MHz FREQUENCY, which is a massive thrust. NVIDIA reveals that they are linked with the micron for the G6X video RAM. These graphic cards set a norm that this RAM supplies the bandwidth of up to 1TB per second.
This performance data might have come through the founder's edition trials or a custom variant featuring both of which have the same oscillatory pulse rate. The web page of CUDA reveals the 320-bit memory configuration. This memory is further processed on the 19 GBPS modules.
The performed trials are aligned with computers. It won't let you drop any data about gaming performance moreover it has updated hardware to speed up the new technologies, for instance, RTX or DLSS. As the main subject is the execution of the RTX 3080, we try our best to bring information about the trials. The data is convened from both CUDA and OpenCL tests.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 on Compubench
| OpenCL C 1.2 | CUDA | Value | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| CL_DEVICE_MAX_COMPUTE_UNITS | CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_MULTIPROCESSOR_COUNT | 68 | SM |
| CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE | 10737418240 | 10 GB | |
| CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_GLOBAL_MEMORY_BUS_WIDTH | 320 | bit | |
| CL_DEVICE_MAX_CLOCK_FREQUENCY | CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_CLOCK_RATE | 1710 | MHz |
| CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_MEMORY_CLOCK_RATE | 9501000 | 19 Gbps | |
| CU_DEVICE_ATTRIBUTE_L2_CACHE_SIZE | 5242880 | 5.1 MB L2 |
NVIDIA RTX 3080 performance
The presentation in both the trials of CUDA and OpenCL is almost average. Both the tests have a resemblance in the results with a more or less difference. There are many claims about the specs of the RTX 3080 in the market; NVIDIA ambitiously claims that this RTX 3080 and the whole RTX series will be more powerful than the current RTX 2080 Ti.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 CUDA Performance
| Perfect Tech Reviews | Unit | RTX 2080 SUPER | RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 3080 |
RTX 2080Ti/ RTX 2080S |
RTX 3080/ RTX 2080S Ti |
RTX 3080/ RTX 2080S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level Set Segmentation – 128 | mVoxels/s | 13498.9 | 17214.4 | 21748.2 | 128% | 126% | 161% |
| Level Set Segmentation – 256 | mVoxels/s | 14211.3 | 18699.1 | 23593.0 | 132% | 126% | 166% |
| Ocean Surface Simulation | Iterations/s | 4528.8 | 5444.4 | 7633.4 | 120% | 140% | 169% |
| Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 3 | mTriangles/s | 418.6 | 405.3 | 510.5 | 97% | 126% | 122% |
| Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 5 | mTriangles/s | 593.41 | 743.7 | 1041.2 | 125% | 140% | 175% |
| N-Body simulation – 128k | Iterations/s | 610.9 | 593.9 | 857.4 | 97% | 144% | 140% |
| N-Body simulation – 1024k | Iterations/s | 92.3 | 116.1 | 163.5 | 126% | 141% | 177% |
| Vertex Connection and Merging | mPixels/s | 19.2 | 24.4 | 39.1 | 127% | 161% | 203% |
| Subsurface Scattering | mSample/s | 12658.4 | 16490.5 | 21184.9 | 130% | 128% | 167% |
| Subsurface Scattering multiple view | mSample/s | 11721.7 | 14764.5 | 19478.7 | 126% | 132% | 166% |
| TV-L1 Optical Flow | mPixels/s | 70.5 | 89.0 | 138.6 | 126% | 156% | 197% |
| AVERAGE | 138% | 168% | |||||
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 OpenCL Performance
| Perfect Tech Reviews | Unit | RTX 2080 SUPER | RTX 2080 Ti | RTX 3080 |
RTX 2080Ti/ RTX 2080S |
RTX 3080/ RTX 2080S Ti |
RTX 3080/ RTX 2080S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ocean Surface Simulation | Iterations/s | 4523.5 | 5652.2 | 7768.5 | 125% | 137% | 172% |
| Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 3 | mTriangles/s | 401.5 | 384.4 | 473.5 | 96% | 123% | 118% |
| Catmull-Clark Subdivision Level 5 | mTriangles/s | 589.6 | 635.1 | 1019.4 | 108% | 161% | 173% |
| N-Body simulation – 128k | Iterations/s | 608.1 | 590.7 | 790.2 | 97% | 134% | 130% |
| N-Body simulation – 1024k | Iterations/s | 91.4 | 115.9 | 162.6 | 127% | 140% | 178% |
| Vertex Connection and Merging | mPixels/s | 19.3 | 24.6 | 39.0 | 127% | 158% | 202% |
| Subsurface Scattering | mSample/s | 11989.0 | 15680.3 | 20915.9 | 131% | 133% | 174% |
| Subsurface Scattering multiple view | mSample/s | 11199.6 | 14500.3 | 19291.1 | 129% | 133% | 172% |
| TV-L1 Optical Flow | mPixels/s | 77.9 | 97.9 | 149.7 | 126% | 153% | 192% |
| AVERAGE | 141% | 168% | |||||
CUDA performance
OpenCL performance
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 specifications
The results were extracted on an average basis. The RTX 3080 has a 168% of RTX 2080 uplifting performance. On the other hand, the RTX 2080 Ti, on average, has 138-141% magnified performance. These cards are power-oriented with 320 watts, while the RTX 2080 super on average has a standard 250 watts.
The benchmarks which are made by NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 includes many specs. The RTX 3080 features an 8nm processor with a GA102-200 GPU. This GPU is correlated with 8704 CUDA cores. This CUDA core is heading the RTX 2080 65% more, and it also leaps over the RTX 2080 Ti 50% more.
While checking up on the graphic cards, memory seems to be the most interrogated feature. These graphic cards are twinning with the 10 GB memory. This memory is a next-generation GDDR6X across a 320-bit memory bus.
They are not officially available. These graphic cards will be in the market on September 17th, but consumers and technology writers won't wait for more. They will post their yardsticks of the founder's edition and illustrate the data on Sep 14th. With the custom reviews but these reviews will be posted after three days.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 30 Series Specifications
Perfect Tech Reviews
RTX 3090
RTX 3080
RTX 3070
RTX 2080 Ti
Picture
Board
PG132 SKU 30
PG132 SKU 10
PG142 SKU 10
PG150 SKU 32
GPU
8nm GA102-300
8nm GA102-200
8nm GA104-300
12nm TU102-300
Die Size
628 mm2
628 mm2
392 mm2
754 mm2
Transistors
28 B
28 B
17.4 B
18.6 B
CUDA Cores
10496
8704
5888
4352
Tensor Cores
328 (4 per SM)
272 (4 per SM)
184 (4 per SM)
544 (8 per SM)
RT Cores
82
68
46
68
Base Clock
1395 MHz
1440 MHz
1500 MHz
1350 MHz
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
1710 MHz
1725 MHz
1545 MHz
Shader Perf.
35.6 TFLOPS
29.8 TFLOPS
20.3 TFLOPS
13.4 TFLOPS
RT Perf.
285 TFLOPS
238 TFLOPS
163 TFLOPS
110 TFLOPS
Memory
24GB G6X
10GB G6X
8GB G6
11GB G6
Memory Clock
19.5 Gbps
19 Gbps
14 Gbps
14 Gbps
Memory Bus
384-bit
320-bit
256-bit
352-bit
Bandwidth
936 GB/s
760 GB/s
441 GB/s
616 GB/s
TDP
350W
320W
220W
250W
MSRP
$1499
>$699
$499
$999
| Perfect Tech Reviews | RTX 3090 | RTX 3080 | RTX 3070 | RTX 2080 Ti |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Picture |
|
|
|
|
| Board | PG132 SKU 30 | PG132 SKU 10 | PG142 SKU 10 | PG150 SKU 32 |
| GPU | 8nm GA102-300 | 8nm GA102-200 | 8nm GA104-300 | 12nm TU102-300 |
| Die Size | 628 mm2 | 628 mm2 | 392 mm2 | 754 mm2 |
| Transistors | 28 B | 28 B | 17.4 B | 18.6 B |
| CUDA Cores | 10496 | 8704 | 5888 | 4352 |
| Tensor Cores | 328 (4 per SM) | 272 (4 per SM) | 184 (4 per SM) | 544 (8 per SM) |
| RT Cores | 82 | 68 | 46 | 68 |
| Base Clock | 1395 MHz | 1440 MHz | 1500 MHz | 1350 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1710 MHz | 1725 MHz | 1545 MHz |
| Shader Perf. | 35.6 TFLOPS | 29.8 TFLOPS | 20.3 TFLOPS | 13.4 TFLOPS |
| RT Perf. | 285 TFLOPS | 238 TFLOPS | 163 TFLOPS | 110 TFLOPS |
| Memory | 24GB G6X | 10GB G6X | 8GB G6 | 11GB G6 |
| Memory Clock | 19.5 Gbps | 19 Gbps | 14 Gbps | 14 Gbps |
| Memory Bus | 384-bit | 320-bit | 256-bit | 352-bit |
| Bandwidth | 936 GB/s | 760 GB/s | 441 GB/s | 616 GB/s |
| TDP | 350W | 320W | 220W | 250W |
| MSRP | $1499 | >$699 | $499 | $999 |
Source: Compubench, VideoCardz
Rustam Iqbal
Hi, I'm Rustam Iqbal. I love traveling, computer hardware, and software. I’m constantly trying to learn new skills and programming languages. Reviewing new pieces of hardware is one of my favorites hobbies. Drop by any time to leave me a message if you have any questions.
